Match: 17
/ 422
Lost by
5 wkts
Team |
Total |
FFTMCC |
137 - 9 |
M. Reeves 44*, I. Howarth
22 |
|
|
|
Lemmings |
143 - 5 |
I. Howarth 1 - 11 |
MAD, MAD, I say unto you, How is it your victories are so few? - A captain’s soliloquy The above rhyming
couplet, from the Cutteslowe Journal,
was typical of the pithy comments regarding the outcome of the Far from the
MCC’s fourteenth encounter against the university graduated Lemmings. After
the latter’s latest 5 wicket victory, headline writers and newspaper
sub-editors played on the fact that “far from the madding” should be post
fixed with “victory”. The Priors Forge
Post pronounced “bad things come to those that haven’t a clue”, whilst
the Summertown Sketch considered
this latest defeat at the paws of the intellectual rodents a nudge to the
selectors. “Now into the seventeenth year of this rivalry, there are many
good judges who insist the FFTMCC are incomplete without youth” and that “the
cast on display were akin to the ailing, blotchy skinned dodderers of the
local bowls society.” The North Oxford
Times was of similar thought, if less kind, running with “Ainsworth
looked isolated, being surrounded by the ageing failures of yore.” Dad’s Army with Ainsworth top right. Just as The MAD’s
performance provoked editorial reflection, so it drew comment from newspaper
readers, with several writing to the Cutteslowe
Journal in the days that followed. The letters, naturally, had a Lemmings
bias and the first to have their say was someone called “Disgusted”, whose
opinions sparked a deal of debate: Sir, The MAD XI on show has
been described as a team of antiquated coffin dodgers. Anyone present, as I
was, at the Cutteslowe ground this afternoon would have amended the
description, citing it as a team of the walking dead. I have followed the
fortunes of The MAD for more years than I care to remember, but I shall waste
no more time watching the performances of this present lot – or was it past?
So inept, so puerile – one might say, so disgraceful after a previous day on
the sauce, a display such as theirs I have never seen. A below par Lemmings
may have been competent at best, but they were shorn of Greany, Williams and
Taylor MBE. The MAD “top order” (one has to put the term in inverted commas)
simply gave their wickets away. If these ageing relics to whom The MAD
committee have recently given caps are the best of the current entry, would
it not be better to simply fold? I hope the person or
persons responsible for opening with Hotson are satisfied with their
handiwork. Hebbes is but a fading memory and Howarth c Wood b J Baker… oh,
the shock, the horror, the inability to ever learn. And an engine room
staffed by Westmoreland and Dobner? Have I indeed slipped back into the sepia
toned, incomprehensible inadequacy of the Pembroke Years? Finally, we have a man
responsible for the circus of T20, thrust into a world he simply cannot
fathom. I understand The MAD captain wanted 100 sixes hitting last season in
a style with no fear or consequence. Might I suggest that a few humble ones
and twos and a little thought would suffice? I won’t comment on the bowling, I
really won’t, lest I refer back to Dobner once more. S. L. P. Dobner (3) outdone by the wiles of pie. “Disgusted”, however,
was in the minority. Most readers recognised a creditable performance by an
admittedly senior MAD outfit and tempered their criticism accordingly. R. P.
Turner of Oxford, wrote: I also was present at
Cutteslowe for much of the second half, and appreciate I have given the club
little time in recent weeks, despite promoting a double affair. Far from “Disgusted”
being correct, we were fairly and squarely beaten, no shame in that. In
addition, I saw a piece of batting so sublime, (from M Baker 67*), as to
render our efforts futile. If “Disgusted” is a sample of the club’s
supporters, it is a bad lookout for this Sunday club. His is an attitude
which confers neither dignity nor decency on the game, and I hope the
majority of cricket lovers will resent it. With regard to the “walking
dead”, I find that distasteful in the extreme; did this individual not see
Hotson’s valiant 26 during the week, Hebbes’ adroit use of the ball, to say
nothing of Howarth’s runs at Horspath at the start of the year? How has
Westmoreland caught more catches than anyone else and scored nearly 4,000 MAD
runs? But to launch into a diatribe about Dobner, a recovering hypochondriac
– has this person no qualms about his jawline? Reeves (44*) wagging like “a good ‘un.” T. P. W. Smith, of
Henley, was largely in agreement, if less eloquent: I’d like to refer to
a letter from a bloke who signs himself “Disgusted” – “Dickhead” more like. I
am one of these guys labelled the “walking dead” and his bull____ is hardly
worth reading, much less replying to, were it not for the fact the majority
of our support are sick of the grumbling f______ and moaning c____ who can
see no good in our team. For the record, Hotson
(0) got a cracker second up, Ainsworth (13) is our POTS for f___ sake, Hebbes
(3) stuck it out for 10 overs against some excellent fast bowling, Howarth
(22) got an under edge when about to fly, Shorten (3) and Westmoreland (4)
got beauties off the pick of their bowling (P Baker 5-2-17-3), and our tail
wagged like a good ‘un. Well, Reeves (44*) and Bullock 20 did anyway. And
Hoskins aside, we never had any of our front line bowlers in attendance. Or
me, because I would have won that bloody match on my own. Footage of the Lemmings fast bowling is
unavailable, so we have used one of James Baker instead. Finally, Edith Cupcake,
who was celebrating her eightieth birthday in the top pavilion, declared: “Disgusted” is a
simply an incongruous fool. One would have noted that the sharp stumping
chance missed by Hotson so early in M Baker’s innings was to be divisive.
There was nothing left in the Lemmings locker after that, save for the elder
of the Baker clan, Tom – a delightful chap who belies his years. His
consummate umpiring and back foot no-balling of Howarth was simply divine. Back Row: Hull, Greenwood, P Baker, R Baker, Smith, T
Baker Bottom Row:
M Baker, J Baker, Wood, Colenutt In summation, the Summertown Sketch continued “for a
reverse of this most predictable
result in The MAD sporting calendar, it is imperative the selectors give this
most illustrious fixture their utmost consideration. It beggars belief that
resources with the ball such as Newman and Darley are unavailable, that the
resurgent batsmanship of Hadfield is again no more, and the workers of the
Centrica colliery are notable by their absence, including an incumbent
skipper who apparently chose his personal life over that of his profession. On
a positive spin, there is always next year, but on a less spinning one, that
has been the case since 2001.” ‘Johannes W. Isden’
|
*
Far from the MCC versus Lemmings Played at Cutteslowe Park, 11 June
2017 Lemmings won the toss and elected to field Lemmings won by 5 wkts Far from the MCC debuts: none |
17 / 422 35 over match |
Team |
Far from the MCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
J. C. W. Hotson † |
b Greenwood |
0 |
(2) |
- |
- |
1-0 |
2 |
L. G. Ainsworth |
c Wood b Colenutt |
13 |
(11) |
3 |
- |
2-16 |
3 |
N. J. Hebbes |
lbw b P. Baker |
3 |
(33) |
- |
- |
3-38 |
4 |
I. Howarth |
c Wood b J. Baker |
22 |
(33) |
2 |
- |
6-50 |
5 |
D. Shorten * |
b P. Baker |
3 |
(9) |
- |
- |
4-46 |
6 |
M. T. Westmoreland |
b P. Baker |
4 |
(3) |
1 |
- |
5-50 |
7 |
S. L. P. Dobner |
b T. Baker |
3 |
(16) |
- |
- |
7-59 |
8 |
M. K. Reeves |
not out |
44 |
(55) |
7 |
- |
- |
9 |
M. Bullock |
b Greenwood |
20 |
(40) |
4 |
- |
8-131 |
10 |
M. S. Rundle |
b Colenutt |
0 |
(3) |
- |
- |
9-132 |
11 |
J. D. Hoskins |
not out |
3 |
(7) |
- |
- |
- |
|
Extras |
NB3, W9, LB4, B5 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(for 9 wickets, 35 overs) |
137 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
Econ |
|
1 |
Greenwood |
7 |
1 |
17 |
2 |
2.43 |
|
2 |
Colenutt |
7 |
1 |
33 |
2 |
4.71 |
|
3 |
P. Baker |
5 |
2 |
17 |
3 |
3.40 |
|
4 |
J. Baker |
5 |
1 |
19 |
1 |
3.80 |
|
5 |
T. Baker |
6 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
2.33 |
|
6 |
Smith |
2 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
8.00 |
|
7 |
M. Baker |
3 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
3.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
Lemmings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
R. Baker |
b Hoskins |
11 |
|
- |
- |
3-31 |
2 |
S. Wood *† |
b Shorten |
3 |
|
- |
- |
1-9 |
3 |
J. Hull |
lbw b Howarth |
5 |
|
1 |
- |
2-21 |
4 |
R. Smith |
c Reeves b Ainsworth |
14 |
|
2 |
- |
4-73 |
5 |
M. Baker |
not out |
67 |
|
9 |
2 |
- |
6 |
J. Colenutt |
c and b Reeves |
2 |
|
- |
- |
5-101 |
7 |
P. Baker |
not out |
16 |
|
- |
- |
- |
8 |
J. Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
C. Greenwood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
T. Baker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extras |
NB1, W7, LB11, B6 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(for 5 wickets, 31 overs) |
143 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
Econ |
|
1 |
Shorten |
6 |
1 |
12 |
1 |
2.00 |
|
2 |
Howarth |
5 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
2.20 |
|
3 |
Hebbes |
6 |
2 |
19 |
0 |
3.17 |
|
4 |
Hoskins |
4 |
1 |
17 |
1 |
4.25 |
|
5 |
Dobner |
1 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
16.00 |
|
6 |
Rundle |
2 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5.00 |
|
7 |
Ainsworth |
3 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
8.00 |
|
8 |
Reeves |
4 |
0 |
28 |
1 |
7.00 |
|
MOTM: M. K. Reeves Champagne Moment: M. K. Reeves’
reactionary caught and bowled Buffet
Award: S. L. P. Dobner’s creamy
courgette lasagne (salad side) MAD
Moment: D. Shorten’s inexplicable
belly flop whilst attempting to field |
Opposition:
V024 / 14 Ground: G001 / 34 Captain: C016 / 24 Match No: 35 / 151 |