Match: 09
/ 177
Won
by 5 wkts
Team |
Total |
Oxford University
Offices |
86 - 9 |
I. Howarth 5 - 5, D. Emerson
2 - 14 |
|
|
|
FFTMCC |
87 - 5 |
D. Emerson 36*, M. Westmoreland 20* |
My recent foray into
deepest darkest Oxfordshire was extremely pleasurable indeed. As an
Inspector, I like to Inspect things, and my good friends Far from the MCC
called me to investigate at, what would first seem a 'disheartening' case of theft?
But upon closer Inspection the theft was a clever ploy to widen the
Investigation of the 'Grass is always Greener' theory. For they had come
across (by no doubt dubious means) an Opposing Teams Match Report of a recent
Twenty20 tussle held at Jesus College in the very heart itself of Oxford Collegism. They invited me to digest the opposing Match
Report (in green Palatino Linotype), and compare to
facts that they had given me according to their own records. Herewith my analyses,
with my comments in BLUE:
Jake (centre) texts the groundsman to say James
is crapping on a bench. Uni Office CC v FFTMCCC <Even in the title I note some interesting facts. It
appears 'Uni Office CC' don't even know who they are playing, despite having
clashed with FFTMCC for almost seven years, sharing several social occasions
and having several players stolen from their ranks by FFTMCC. This I put down
to either a total lack of respect, or a spelling mistake, which, being
associated with the University is a travesty in itself. Of course it could be
something to do with the fact that FFTMCC have mutated their name so many
times, that Offices actually don't care what their opponents are called any
more, and anyway, there are far too many C's> Jesus College 10th July 2009 It was a fine summer’s
eve at the Jesus College cricket pitch when these two titans of the game got
together to decide once and for all who could down the most—I mean display
the best cricketing skillz. <FFTMCC players inform me
that they never enter drinking competitions, and don't contain any pissheads
in their Team. They are equally confused however about the concept of
cricketing skills, however it is spelt.>
A pointless photo of a tractor. At Jesus College. Having won the toss (*spoiler alert!* about the only
thing that the Offices won on this occasion) the Skip and his paunch
sauntered over to inform us we’d be first up in smacking the ball all over
the pitch against these boozed up Madders—and
that HE in his Skipping prowess and glory would be undertaking the
responsibility of opening the batting. Hurrah! This should be good…. <FFTMCC players inform me of
a hilarious jape that preceded the coin toss involving said paunchy Captain
receiving a hoax call while inspecting the groundsman's tractor. This he left
himself particularly open to having appeared at the ground under some pressure
as all of his confirmed players appeared to be dropping out with Swine Flu,
or had other commitments. The Offices skipper failed to recognise the voice
of the ex-MAD skipper, who pretended to be a player stranded at Jordan Hill
expecting the game to start at 17:30> <FFTMCC players also inform
me they were not 'boozed up' merely enjoying an after work swifty before commencing their traditional pre match warm
up of 7.5% cider> With thoughts of his 1
run innings in the previous weekend’s Tour still dancing in his head, the
Skip settled in gingerly along with the trusty (*spoiler alert!* or not so trusty on this occasion) Mustard
aka “that kiwi”. After prodding the
opening bowlers for cracks in the FFTMCC field, Skip decided to flex his
muscles straight to mid-wicket—unlucky
Skip! <FFTMCC have no comment about
this mostly factually correct statement although dispute the fact about
Darley's 1 run inning the previous weekend when it clearly states in the
score book that the innings consisted of three dots before he cowed one to
the tiny hands of I. Howarth waiting on the boundary>
Tony (left) is amused by the idiot on his right. Mustard—clearly affected by the loss of the big guy—succumbed under vociferous anti-kiwi chants, often coming from
that traitor (and fellow kiwi) Prog.rock…with not a
run to be had… <Strange, the accused stole
Kiwi remembers nothing of the anti-Kiwi chants, and we have never heard him
proffer anti Kiwi chants in the field unless he has had one too many 7.5%
ciders pre-match. Oh, bearing that fact in mind, maybe he did make those
chants after all> Thankfully, the Offices
had a bit of punch left in ‘em as Kevin “Dyno” Rodd
strode out to produce a composed 16, whilst being unaffected by the French
capitulation that was Vincent’s canard…merde—signed by an Emerson catch. <FFTMCC would like to point
out in this point of the game, when Uni Offices were flayling
around at 19 for 4 off 6 overs, we did not consider their attack to be
particularly 'punchy'. This statement would also seem to be backed up by the
tirade of abuse thrown at them by their own players on the Boundary politely
reminding them that this *was* a f%&*ing 20/20> Backed up by Thomas’s
splendid 27 (who is this guy??) and a typical Psycho enthused 19 (brought to
a halt by <Agreed who *was* that Thomas
guy? FFTMCC inform me that Uni Offices shouldn't worry too much about who
this Thomas guy is, he will probably playing for them next season.>
The victorious MAD are applauded as they trudge
off. They sometimes talk of
“games within the games” and the Farenga-Emerson
clash had been eagerly anticipated (well, by Farenga
and Emerson anyway). <FFTMCC also often talk about
games within games, but suffice to say that they did not expect to bowl Uni
Offices out within the allotted 20 overs thus having the possibility of
playing two games in forty overs.> The ex-housemates had
become bitter rivals as the cleaning rota disintegrated in the weeks leading
up to the Warwick St Split—and
now threatened to spill out onto the pitch. <FFTMCC also keen to note the one sided nature of this
intriguing Match Report, although they have been known to exhibit Self
Importance in many other areas of cricket, Match Reports is generally not one
of them. Strange that this report fails to mention the unbeaten bat of D.
Emerson, an amazing display of batting prowess striking a sparkling 36,
including a huge maximum off the bowling of Mayfair. This historic (historic
due to the fact that it was his first MAD innings over 20) was hit at a
strike rate of no less than 163.6363r. It also fails to mention the Captain's innings of an
unbeaten 20. M. Westmoreland bringing the team home after a minor batting
collapse caused by J. Hoskins (0) claiming he could beat the Offices even
playing under the darkness of his sunglasses in failing light. Also the
Offices report appears to talk down Howarth's five-for, which must surely be
held up in lights with figures of 4-1-5-5. Not only this, I don't think I
have ever witnessed, in just four overs of bowling the spectacle of TWO
Hat-trick balls…. Howarth pulls a gay pose with that ball. And Offices…*where* are your photos? All in all though, an interesting comparison of events
from the scribes of both teams. Long may this good humoured rivalry last – cricket can
remain to be the outstanding winner, not to mention the Landlord of the Marsh
Harrier where the teams decided to quell their unending thirsts.> ‘Match
Report Inspector’
|
*
Far from the MCC versus Oxford
University Offices Played at Jesus College, 10 July 2009 Oxford University Offices won the
toss and elected to bat Far from the MCC won by 5 wkts Far from the MCC debuts:
none |
09 / 177 20 over match |
Team |
Oxford University Offices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
A. Darley * |
c Westmoreland b Howarth |
5 |
|
- |
- |
2-5 |
2 |
H. Coleman |
c Westmoreland b Howarth |
0 |
|
- |
- |
1-5 |
3 |
K. Rodd |
c Reeves b Smith |
16 |
|
1 |
- |
4-33 |
4 |
V. Manaut |
c Emerson b Reeves |
0 |
|
- |
- |
3-9 |
5 |
A. Thomas |
c Edwards b Emerson |
27 |
|
2 |
- |
5-83 |
6 |
M. Rundle |
c Edwards b Emerson |
19 |
|
3 |
- |
9-86 |
7 |
Sharpe |
b Howarth |
0 |
|
- |
- |
6-86 |
8 |
S. Faranga
+ |
b Howarth |
1 |
|
- |
- |
7-86 |
9 |
R. Mather |
b Howarth |
0 |
|
- |
- |
8-86 |
10 |
K. Rodd |
not out |
0 |
|
- |
- |
- |
11 |
Mayfair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extras |
(NB1, W5, LB8, B4) |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(all out, 19.1 overs) |
86 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
|
1 |
Howarth |
4 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
|
2 |
Reeves |
4 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
|
3 |
Clarke |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
4 |
Hoskins |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
5 |
Smith |
3 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
|
6 |
Edwards |
3 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
|
7 |
Emerson |
2.1 |
0 |
14 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: K. Rodd batted twice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
Far from
the MCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
D. M. Edwards |
c Faranga b
Manaut |
3 |
(7) |
- |
- |
1-6 |
2 |
A. M. Mander |
b Manaut |
5 |
(11) |
- |
- |
2-19 |
3 |
T. P. W. Smith |
c Rodd b Sharpe |
8 |
(7) |
2 |
- |
3-19 |
4 |
M. K. Reeves |
c Faranga b
Mayfair |
8 |
(8) |
1 |
- |
4-39 |
5 |
D. Emerson |
not out |
36 |
(23) |
5 |
1 |
- |
6 |
J. D. Hoskins |
b Mayfair |
0 |
(1) |
- |
- |
5-45 |
7 |
M. T. Westmoreland * |
not out |
20 |
(16) |
2 |
- |
- |
8 |
M. D. Clarke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
G. Carter + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
I. Howarth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extras |
(W3, LB2, B2) |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(for 5 wickets, 12.1 overs) |
87 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
|
1 |
Sharpe |
3 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
|
2 |
Manaut |
2 |
0 |
11 |
2 |
|
3 |
Mayfair |
2 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
|
4 |
Thomas |
3.1 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
|
5 |
Coleman |
2 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
|
MOTM: I. Howarth Champagne Moment: M. K. Reeves’ tumbling
catch in the outfield Buffet
Award: T. P. W. Smith’s vegetarian
hotpot (with cabbage sides) |
Opposition:
V035 / 09 Ground: G019 / 03 Captain: C011 / 10 |