Match: 18
/ 453
Won
by 4 wkts
Team |
Total |
Lemmings |
232 - 5 |
D. Shorten
1 - 4 |
|
|
|
FFTMCC |
237 - 6 |
R. Hadfield
81*, J. Pearson 76 |
“If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.” Thomas H Palmer. “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again whilst
expecting different results.” Probably Rita Mae Brown, probably not Albert Einstein. Why do we do it eh? Why
do we bother playing the Lemmings each year? Why are we stuck in this Greek
myth, condemned like Sisyphus to this infernal and eternal task? As
chronicled below, since 2001, in fourteen attempts over seventeen years, the
closest the FFTMCC has come to beating Papa Lemming, his assorted sons and
their college friends, was them giving us the beat down with two wickets and
two overs to spare. ·
2001 – 6 wickets and 8 overs ·
2002 – 204 runs ·
2003 – 9 wickets ·
2004 – 42 runs ·
2005 – 7 wickets and 4 overs ·
2006 – 4 wickets and 4 overs ·
2007 – rain ·
2008 – 2 wickets and 2 overs ·
2009 – 6 wickets and 19 overs ·
2010 – 29 runs ·
2011 – 40 runs ·
2012 – rain ·
2013 – 116 runs ·
2014 – 23 runs ·
2015 – 41 runs ·
2016 – rain ·
2017 – 5 wickets and 4 overs Along the way there’d been total stuffings interspersed with glimmers of
hope before they went through the gears (and some rain.) Could 2018 be any
different? Well there was a glimmer of hope, they only had nine this year,
before the call went out and Raguav turned up with the skills and demeanour
of a first class player. On the bright side, they
are a decent bunch, gracious winners, in fact everything we look for in an
opposition, apart that is from being a little bit too good. We were also back
at our home ground, with the sun shining and everything pretty much right
with the world. The FFTMCC were also
short of a regular or two. Gary Timms was turning Japanese whilst Russ was
watching some no-hopers (England) being out classed by a bunch of ringers
(Scotland) so it was Spam in charge of losing the toss and marshalling his
forces for the first 35 overs. James Baker (centre) has enjoyed dancing on The
MAD corpse for years. Rundle (5-1-27-1) opened
from one end, bowled well and was rewarded with a
clean bowl of the opener Williams for 13. Unfortunately, this bought M Baker
(65 off 53) to the crease, to join Raguav (47 off 29.) M Baker was batting up
the order this year after his unbeaten 67 to win the game down the order last
year. Together they troubled the scorers at an alarming rate and a score of
300 looked likely. As is often the case these days, Howarth (2-0-20-1) very
quickly grew tired of line and length (after two balls, both smashed for
four) so threw down a rank full toss. Raguav climbed into it and sent it
skywards in the direction of the boundary, but also Dave Shorten. In a report
full of questions, here’s another one. Has there
ever been a more important catch for The MAD? Dave,
running forward, cupped both hands under it and to the relief of all fielders
saved the team an estimated 150 runs. A shoe-in for
the Champagne moment surely. Still the Lemmings
clattered along and at 118 for two in the sixteenth over the game was
effectively over. Captain Spam took the not unreasonable decision to share
the pain around with only Hoskins (7-0-48-1) stemming the flow a little,
finally after 132 runs spread over two innings, getting rid of M Baker. Still
the rampage continued with J Hull and P Baker scoring lots of runs off of not many balls. Thankfully
it was only 35 overs, but as The MAD limped off, The Lemmings had amassed 229
runs. In 452 matches, we’d only scored more than
that on five occasions and never chased down more than 200. Enjoy Kate’s
wonderful tea everyone, play for your averages and hopefully it won’t be too embarrassing. Emerson sans hair with cap. With P Baker succumbing
to a migraine, there were only nine Lemmings in the field to chase the ball
around. No volunteers were forthcoming from The MAD to fill the gaps, not
through bad sportsmanship, but simply at our age and on a hot day, 35 overs is plenty to be stood around in the outfield. The
pencilled-in victory was now inked over as The MAD crawled to sixteen of
nought in the first six overs, with Pearson in particular
not batting like a man with any hope of dragging his team to 230 plus.
With the loss of opener Emerson (30) the mercurial Hadfield came to the
crease. Pearson now revealed something rarely seen in a MAD batting line-up,
it looked like he was actually trying to construct an innings and when he
fell for 76 off just 76 balls, we were 140 for two in the 23rd over. Victory
was still an impossible way off, but a degree of respectability had been
achieved. In at four was Dave
Shorten, a renowned big hitter. He hit 27 in eighteen balls and with Hadfield
now also going ballistic at the other end something remarkable could possibly
be in the works. Hadfield (81 not out off 61 balls) was now going in to overdrive, batting like a man possessed. He was
joined by the skipper (15) and with the excitement and tension on the
boundary going through the roof, the pair took the team to the brink of
victory, needing just one to tie, two to win off the final over. Back came
James Baker to write the end of the story, but surely it was a formality. Pearson doing all the work whilst his team mates get busy in deckchairs. Cricket is a cruel game,
but could there be anything crueller than this? Already on the boundary
several were singing “18 years of hurt” to the tune of Skinner and Baddiel’s
1996 hit, whilst Dave Shorten was saying “we’re going to win, there I’ve said
it” as James Baker sent down the first of his six deliveries. It smacked into
Howarth’s pads and the Lemmings as one, went up for a shout of LBW. Mark Rundle, in the
umpire’s coat had a decision to make. The easy thing to do would be to deny
it, but in one of several heroic actions by the team that day he raised his
finger and Howarth was gone. If we were going to win this, we were going to
do it the hard way, but the fair way. Mad nerves were calmed by the sight of
next man in, Mike Reeves. Nicknamed “the finisher” (only by James Hoskins I
believe) the man with the most not-outs for the club, he is the guy you want
to bring us home in this situation. A conversation ensued familiar to many
left-handers: Hadfield: He’s swinging the ball in. Reeves: Is
that in to you, therefore away to me? Hadfield: Yes,
I think so. Hadfield (batting) didn’t
hear any sledging from Pies about having only nine fielders. Mr
Baker, sent down delivery number two, which did indeed swing away to
a left hander, but still it was a nice length and should have been a
formality to crash away in to the vacant outfield for victory. But no, a
slight, but undeniable contact and it was through to the keeper and Reeves
was gone. It was now squeaky bum time with Chris Roberts arriving at crease.
The worst thing that Bob could have done in that situation was to do nothing,
so spooning it in the air, just long enough for the batsmen to cross was not
the worst thing, but still this was turning into a tragedy of epic
proportions. In the melee, it almost passed by that James Baker had just
picked up a hattrick. Three balls to go then, Hadfield on strike, Hoskins at
the other end and the fielders all in close. This really was it, losing this
would not only mean not playing the Lemmings again (how could we after this),
but our confidence and happy go lucky, self-effacing sense of humour and the
idea of playing cricket at all would have been shaken to its core. Cometh the hour etc etc, J Baker sent down the third to last delivery and
Richard John Bingham Hadfield launched a straight drive back over Baker’s
head, over the boundary and to victory. That was it, we’d
done it, wow. And again wow. Is this the greatest Mad victory ever? The
highest ever run chase, the victory I don’t think
anyone ever thought possible. With Corne having to
leave immediately after the game, the ten players split the Champagne moment
between Shorten’s catch and Hadfield’s victory six. Man
of the Match was split between Pearson and Hadfield. Nothing could have been
more apt. Hoskins (right) is probably the greatest scorer
using multi-coloured pens this club has ever known. It turns out that the
Lemmings are as gracious in defeat as they are in victory, joining us at the
pub afterwards, but what of the future of this fixture? Has the tide turned,
or will this result come to be seen as an outlier,
an aberration? Or will it, like “Milton away”, wither and die now that the
spell has been broken? Still, without descending into hyperbole, this club
loves its history and documents it meticulously. This one will go down. ‘Reevsie’
|
*
Far from the MCC versus Lemmings Played at Brasenose College, 10 June
2018 Lemmings won the toss and elected to
bat Far from the MCC won by 4 wkts Far from the MCC debuts: none |
18 / 453 35 over match |
Team |
Lemmings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
P. Williams † |
b Rundle |
13 |
|
3 |
- |
1-44 |
2 |
Raghav |
c Shorten b Howarth |
47 |
|
7 |
2 |
2-78 |
3 |
M. Baker |
b Hoskins |
66 |
|
9 |
1 |
4-153 |
4 |
J. Fleming |
b Reeves |
14 |
|
2 |
- |
3-122 |
5 |
J. Hull |
b Shorten |
49 |
|
7 |
1 |
5-228 |
6 |
P. Baker |
not out |
32 |
|
2 |
- |
- |
7 |
T. Baker |
not out |
2 |
|
- |
- |
- |
8 |
R. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
J. Baker * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
G. French |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extras |
W2, LB5, B2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(for 5 wickets, 35 overs) |
232 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
Econ |
|
1 |
Roberts |
4 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
7.75 |
|
2 |
Rundle |
5 |
1 |
27 |
1 |
5.40 |
|
3 |
Reeves |
5 |
0 |
31 |
1 |
6.20 |
|
4 |
Howarth |
2 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
10.00 |
|
5 |
Pearson |
3 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
7.67 |
|
6 |
Hoskins |
7 |
0 |
48 |
1 |
6.86 |
|
7 |
Vermaak |
5 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
5.80 |
|
8 |
Shorten |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2.00 |
|
9 |
Emerson |
2 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
Far from the MCC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# |
Batsman |
How Out |
Total |
Balls |
4s |
6s |
FOW |
1 |
D. Emerson |
b Smith |
30 |
(32) |
2 |
- |
1-59 |
2 |
J. W. Pearson |
c Williams b T. Baker |
76 |
(76) |
9 |
2 |
2-145 |
3 |
R. J. B. Hadfield |
not out |
81 |
(61) |
9 |
1 |
- |
4 |
D. Shorten |
b M. Baker |
27 |
(18) |
2 |
2 |
3-177 |
5 |
I. Howarth * |
lbw b J. Baker |
15 |
(19) |
1 |
- |
4-231 |
6 |
M. K. Reeves |
c Williams b J. Baker |
0 |
(1) |
- |
- |
5-231 |
7 |
C. D. Roberts |
c M. Baker b J. Baker |
0 |
(1) |
- |
- |
6-231 |
8 |
J. D. Hoskins |
not out |
0 |
(0) |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
M. S. Rundle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
C. J. Vermaak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
G. Carter † |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extras |
W2, LB3, B3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
(for 6 wickets, 34.4 overs) |
237 |
|
|
|
|
# |
Bowler |
Overs |
Maidens |
Runs |
Wkts |
Econ |
|
1 |
J. Baker |
6.4 |
0 |
35 |
3 |
5.25 |
|
2 |
M. Baker |
7 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
2.29 |
|
3 |
French |
6 |
0 |
51 |
0 |
8.50 |
|
4 |
Smith |
4 |
0 |
32 |
1 |
8.00 |
|
5 |
T. Baker |
4 |
0 |
39 |
1 |
9.75 |
|
6 |
Raghav |
7 |
0 |
56 |
0 |
8.00 |
|
MOTM: J. W. Pearson & R. J. B. Hadfield Champagne Moment: D. Shorten boundary catch & R. J. B. Hadfield winning six Buffet
Award: I. Howarth’s wholesome
shepherd’s pie (extra vegetables) MAD
Moment: n/a |
Opposition:
V024 / 15 Ground: G040 / 63 Captain: C007 / 64 Match No: 35 / 160 |